Progenitor of ‘Bhut Jolokia’ Found?

Dave DeWitt MyBlog Leave a Comment

Share on Facebook0Tweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+0Email this to someone

 

 

Jonah 7 Superhot ChileFor the 5+ years that the rumors and then stories about the  superhot ‘Bhut Jolokia’ from Assam in northeast India have surfaced, I’ve wondered about its origin.  Pods of Capsicum chinense are found all over the Caribbean, from the Scotch bonnet in Jamaica to goat peppers in Haiti to bonney peppers in Barbados.  However, it is the country of Trinidad & Tobago that seems to have the largest number of land races of that species, including the Congo pepper, the Scorpion, the 7 Pot, and now the Jonah 7, pictured here.  Of all of these, it’s the Jonah 7 which most resembles the ‘Bhut Jolokia’, and the India connection to Trinidad is very clear: 40% of the people have an Indian ancestry, as compared to 37.5 % with an African ancestry.  So it’s my theory that sometime after the Indian migration to T&T began in 1845, some enterprising person took Jonah seeds to India and they ended up as Bhut Jolokia, or “ghost pepper” in Assamese.  Recently, Marlin Bensinger, a friend of mine and the world’s foremost expert on capsaicin extraction and testing, performed HPLC tests on the Jonah 7, and it was in the precise heat range of ‘Bhut Jolokia’.  So maybe a mystery has been solved!  Thanks to Jim Duffy in San Diego, who grew out the pods and photographed them.

My esteemed colleague in Germany, Harald Zoschke, comments: “My theory is that Bhut evolved from Fatalii (which, of course could very well come from Trinidad, brought home to Africa by returning slaves). Please take a look at the attached picture – a Bhut Jolokia and a Bhut and Fataali ComparisonFatalii pod from my greenhouse. To me, they look like close relatives (and there’s a Red Fatalii around, too). Now, what if Bhut is a Red Fatalii that trade ships brought from its home, Central Africa, to India, hundreds of years ago. And there, it just got cross-pollinated to receive the C. frutescens gene traces that Paul Bosland’s DNA test revealed. Or maybe those genes were in the Fatalii already, which a DNA test could easily prove, providing evidence for my theory. Remember, besides C. chinense, Bhut’s Innards of Bhut and FataliiDNA includes 7% of C. frutescens. Fatalii could have picked this up from Malagueta, which had spread early in Africa, becoming pili-pili or peri-peri. Also, while Fatalii isn’t quite as hot as Bhut, both share that intense “instant burn,” as opposed to the Habanero’s delayed burn. And as my pic #2 shows, both share the poor innards, with very few seeds.  Who knows, maybe all three are very closely related.”                                                  Fat Bhut

My comment back is that in this particular instance, Harald’s ‘Bhut’ certainly does resemble a ‘Fatalii’, but pod variations within a land race are common, and sometimes the pods on the same plant have different forms.  See another pod shape of the ‘Bhut’ at right.  This is because they are land races–adapted varieties that have been growing in the same geographic area for hundreds of years–and not recently bred-to-be-true varieties.  The only way to really figure this out is to compare the DNA of all these varieties.

 

Share on Facebook0Tweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+0Email this to someone